Ryan Cheng challenges a Victoria opponent for the ball. Ryan scored two goals in the game. (Photo 8 © Les Tan/Red Sports)
Victoria School’s flying Finn Riku Alatalo tormented Catholic High with his silky skills and finished with one goal. (Photo 9 © Les Tan/Red Sports)
Darrell Er of Catholic High (in red) scored one goal in the final. (Photo 10 © Les Tan/Red Sports)
Joshua Lee of Catholic High had one goal in the game. (Photo 11 © Les Tan/Red Sports)
Haziq (Victoria #3) sees the ball go agonisingly past an open Catholic High goal. (Photo 12 © Les Tan/Red Sports)
Go to next page for more photos and videos
if catholic high is tt gd, they will be in the top 4 nxt yr. but they will not, for obvious reasons
It’s a matter of the batch of players (:
Ha Ha, It is a fact. Someone hates fact. Well they could have won or lost and that is not the question. Weak or good defence is not the issue. The fact is they are unbeaten. Hard to swallow right. So in the same light CHS was lucky ha ha too.
“Someone hates fact.”
I’m not sure which “Someone” you’re referring to, but I LOVE fact! 🙂
“Well they could have won or lost and that is not the question. Weak or good defence is not the issue.”
But it IS an issue, and an important one, because a strong/weak defence is CRUCIAL to the result, whether the result is a win, loss or draw (or, as you like to euphemistically say, “unbeaten”).
“The fact is they are unbeaten. Hard to swallow right.”
Then may I say, the fact is BMS *failed to win* their last 3 matches due to their weak defence; hard to swallow, right? xD
“So in the same light CHS was lucky ha ha too.”
I’ve never denied that CHS received some good luck this season (which includes meeting with weak defences from some teams, and I’m not referring to VS only); but that does not mean that they don’t deserve to win the championship because they do, for obvious reasons. 🙂
Cheers justanotherfanofchsfloorball2011bdivteam! CHS ROCKS
I guess the only undefeated team in regulation time is BMS eventhough they lost their semi-finals and 3rd and 4th placings on penalties.
So may I say, “Well done, BMS!” despite conceding nearly 20 goals in your last 3 matches that ended in draws, but which could have easily ended in losses in regulation time due to your weak defence during those 3 matches? ^^;
Yea. But BMS beat CH 4-1. So the “Champion” CH, could only score a single goal against a “weak” BMS defence? Oh c’mon. All your comments are “pro-CH’, which is extremely irritating to some other readers. Try being a little more fair to the other teams will ya?
“But BMS beat CH 4-1. So the “Champion” CH, could only score a single goal against a “weak” BMS defence?”
May I ask, did I ever say that the BMS defence was weak against CHS in that particular match?
Once again, people are putting words in my mouth! *sigh*
I’ve consistently said that the BMS defence was weak during those last 3 matches of their season, which was the MAIN reason they failed to qualify for the Final, in my opinion!
If the BMS defence was much stronger, I dare say they would have probably beat VS in the semi-final during regulation time, and possibly beat CHS in the Final.
“All your comments are “pro-CH’, which is extremely irritating to some other readers.”
I’m a fan of their 2011 ‘B’ Boys floorball team, so obviously my comments are generally “pro-CH”; would it make any sense for my comments to be anti-CH or even neutral? If my comments irritate some readers, then they’ll just have to learn to be patient, because I can also say that their comments are “extremely irritating” to me, but I’d rather not, because I have more fun posting the way I have been posting so far! xD
“Try being a little more fair to the other teams will ya?”
If you have managed to read ALL my comments, plus my messages in the Chat Box over the past few days, I have tried “being a little more fair” to both BMS and VS; in fact, I’ve even praised their attack and the skilfulness of some of their players.
But to be truly fair, flaws also have to be pointed out, right? Otherwise, it would not be fairness, but simply blind praise.
awww you must be from some weak floorball school to comment about bmss floorball. wells i understand even though i am from sgs i know how good they are no point commenting on them
“awww you must be from some weak floorball school to comment about bmss floorball.”
Okay then, would you like to guess what school? xD
lol haha oh yeah bms weak defence only appeared at the last few matches.
Victoria school’s line up:
Goal Keepers: Nasrulhaq, Ezra Taliv Mo
Line 1: Akmal Shaharudin #12, Riku Alatalo #83, Matthew Yong #47, Hadi #56
Line 2: Hamizan Ismail #28, Nicholas #19, Yusuf # 26, Henri #53
Line 3: Simon Fang (#?), Muhd Adib #27, Haziq (#3), Syahid #66
Thanks for all your updates, Flooballx.
Victoria school (#28) is hamizan ismail and i belive you should add 1 more to the goal scorers list which is (#47) matthew yong
Its not #17 that scored the 1st goal for victoria its #47
”Catholic High’s captain Darrell Er then added two more long-range goals to put his team 3-0 up and leave the Victoria supporters rather subdued.”
Darrell only scored 1. The third goal a pass by Darrell to the blind side of the keeper which Crenshawn finished.
And not
”The move paid off with Catholic High’s forward Ryan Cheng squaring for teammate Crenshawn Lim to score and maintain a more comfortable three-goal cushion.”
This was a save by the Victorian goalie.
Thanks for the update.